decimate
For
troyfish and
grauwulf and anyone else liable to find it interesting: (and my computer dictionary is mean and won't let me select and copy text, so this may be abbreviated somewhat...)
definition 2 (historical) kill one in every ten of (a group of soldiers or others) as a punishment for the whole group.
Originally applied to a punishment for mutinous Roman Legions, but became generalized as a punishment for a group of people, or merely to kill one in ten people (as in "the virus decimated the population") before being skewed into the modern sense of destroying a large percentage of something. Purists believe that it should only be applied to people, and one can not decimate crops for instance. Originally used in English to refer to a tithe, and later to Cromwell's tax on Royalists. (er?) Even in the modern skewed sense of drastic reduction of forces, it doesn't mean "destroy utterly." (did anyone think that?)
---
So in other words, I am a bad classics major, and while I may have remembered my numbers right, I'd forgotten the punishment bit entirely. Sorry about that. (what was that I was saying about not listening to me when I'm wrong?)
definition 2 (historical) kill one in every ten of (a group of soldiers or others) as a punishment for the whole group.
Originally applied to a punishment for mutinous Roman Legions, but became generalized as a punishment for a group of people, or merely to kill one in ten people (as in "the virus decimated the population") before being skewed into the modern sense of destroying a large percentage of something. Purists believe that it should only be applied to people, and one can not decimate crops for instance. Originally used in English to refer to a tithe, and later to Cromwell's tax on Royalists. (er?) Even in the modern skewed sense of drastic reduction of forces, it doesn't mean "destroy utterly." (did anyone think that?)
---
So in other words, I am a bad classics major, and while I may have remembered my numbers right, I'd forgotten the punishment bit entirely. Sorry about that. (what was that I was saying about not listening to me when I'm wrong?)
no subject
Marrion-Webster has a definition that is "to reduce drastically especially in number", which while not "destroy utterly" generally brings to mind more than a 10% reduction in force.
no subject
definitions one and two are along the lines of "reduced in number" which is the standard modern meaning-- I would have to go check the OED downstairs to tell you when the shift occurred, but I think by "historical" they more or less mean "obsolete (in modern usage)"
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(admittedly, most of my intro classes were taken before I was planning on being a classics major, so the notes got cut up for the interesting bits and the rest discarded.)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2006-10-23 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)My brain is going. I really ought to remember these things...
oops
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
>>"we meet again, but your jacket is gone,"
Man, more people need to be like that professor.
I'm uselessly commenting on all your entries, aren't I?